The Political Economy of the American Frontier. By Ilia Murtazashvili. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 282p. $90.00
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 1164-1165
ISSN: 1541-0986
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 1164-1165
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Marine policy, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 782-789
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 782-790
ISSN: 0308-597X
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Forest Enhancement (REDD+) has become a central focus of global climate change mitigation efforts. Even though the international demand for forest-based carbon sequestration is the key driver of REDD+, forest protection strategies must be implemented on the ground. This cross-scale nature of REDD+ explains why scholars and policy makers increasingly favor nested governance arrangements over either fully centralized or fully decentralized REDD+ governance. The focus of the literature on nested REDD+ governance has mostly been on monitoring, reporting, and verification of carbon emission reductions across sub-national, national, and international levels. We build on Ostrom's principle of 'nested enterprises' to argue that REDD+ must be designed to systematically and formally link national policy reforms with the organization and execution of sub-national (regional and local) forest conservation efforts led by forest users. We also contribute new insights on the political dimensions of nestedness in REDD+, with important roles for inter-community forestry associations and forest rights movements.
BASE
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Forest Enhancement (REDD+) has become a central focus of global climate change mitigation efforts. Even though the international demand for forest-based carbon sequestration is the key driver of REDD+, forest protection strategies must be implemented on the ground. This cross-scale nature of REDD+ explains why scholars and policy makers increasingly favor nested governance arrangements over either fully centralized or fully decentralized REDD+ governance. The focus of the literature on nested REDD+ governance has mostly been on monitoring, reporting, and verification of carbon emission reductions across sub-national, national, and international levels. We build on Ostrom's principle of 'nested enterprises' to argue that REDD+ must be designed to systematically and formally link national policy reforms with the organization and execution of sub-national (regional and local) forest conservation efforts led by forest users. We also contribute new insights on the political dimensions of nestedness in REDD+, with important roles for inter-community forestry associations and forest rights movements.
BASE
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 344-343
ISSN: 0048-5950
In: Kashwan, Prakash, and Robert Holahan. 2014. "Nested Governance for Effective Redd+: Institutional and Political Arguments ". International Journal of the Commons 8: 554–75.
SSRN
In: EPSA 2013 Annual General Conference Paper 681
SSRN
Working paper
In: Review of policy research, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 258-279
ISSN: 1541-1338
AbstractWe investigate how Eastern Ohio landowners affected by the recent boom in high‐volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) view the industry and the factors that affect their attitudes. Our unique sample almost exclusively contains individuals whose land is under lease for and/or experiencing HVHF. Nation‐ and state‐wide surveys that investigate HVHF attitudes tend to find nearly even splits between opposed and supportive respondents, whose views are strongly influenced by political partisanship. These trends largely do not manifest among Eastern Ohio landowners, for whom personal experiences with HVHF crucially influence attitudes. Most respondents support HVHF and say it has benefited their community economically. Political partisanship does not significantly impact HVHF views. Contrary to arguments in the literature that economic considerations drive variation in support for HVHF, landowners' support for the industry also appears influenced by perceptions of its environmental and infrastructure impacts. Environmental concerns appear to more powerfully shape attitudes than economic benefits.
In: APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper